Cruiser Stalingrad: 9 ships destroyed on map Warrior’s Path – World of Warships

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (440 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Cruiser Stalingrad: 9 ships destroyed on map Warrior’s Path – World of Warships
Stalingrad: 244k damage, 9 ships destroyed – World of Warships
WoWs replays – best World of Warships games
Stalingrad is a Soviet tier X Cruiser.
The Stalingrad is part of the Soviet Cruiser line.
#WorldofWarships #WoWs #WOWsreplays
One of the few heavy artillery ships developed after the end of World War II. She had a very high speed for her size and her armament consisted of specially designed 305 mm guns, unrivaled in terms of her maximum firing range and ballistics.

Battle Stats:
Version: 0.11.7
Server: EU
Time: 12-08-2022 21:09:15 EU TIME
Player: BlackBerkut
Ship: Stalingrad
Damage: 244945
Destroyed ships: 9
Map: Warrior’s Path
A hypothetical Canadian archipelago is the setting for Warrior’s Path. Opposing teams must navigate through numerous islands in order to engage the enemy, and only careful positioning will allow capital ships to support their teammates without risk of crippling torpedo strikes from destroyers lurking amongst the rocks. This map can only be played in three-area Domination Battle mode.

Mods used for the replay recordings: WG modstation (calm sea, fog removed) World of Warships

You want to send me your WoWs replay?
Requirements: +3k BXP or +300k dmg, or 8 ships destroyed, or Solo Warrior. Send me the link/replay via mail, to find on the channel info page. Thank you!


  1. Good job you just need to practice on your even a little bit and you’ll be a damn good ship and your teammates let you down they will all running on doing no more thing you’d have to backup you it been less damage on you

  2. He got the nerves of steel. +1

  3. Tânia Gonçalves

    It is a cruiser with a battleship soul, so it is sometimes difficult to maneuver and so on. But, you overcame this detail and made all the difference to the team. You are to be congratulated!

  4. Bot match, obviously.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *