——————————
World of Warships is a multiplayer warship battle game – you can find out more at worldofwarships.eu
Want to see me playing live?
——————————
World of Warships is a multiplayer warship battle game – you can find out more at worldofwarships.eu
Want to see me playing live?
I can’t wait for the RN BB line
With all the secondary batteries in back do ya have to do a Sir Robin
and “Run Away” from destroyers and then lose use of your mains? Did you
have any games where the secondarys did do much damage?
Go on Jedi!
Call her the Dunker Queue!
You know you want to!
Have you considered grinding arty to make you sleep?
I thought the Warspites dispersion was excellent when I first got her. Like
I’d get consistently tight groupings. So I thought it was because of good
sigma values…but nowadays I play the Warspite and it’s terribly
inconsistent. I’ve not read of any nerfs to her accuracy but I’m almost
sure of it…. Can anyone else relate with that?
Hope you get on top of your insomnia soon Jedi. I work lots of night shifts
and I know what it’s like to not be able to sleep! Thanks for the vid.
26s reload is what I would like to see buffed on Dunkerque as well. 28s is
nothing compared to the 30s on the 14-in guns. Almost-fewest guns (tied
with Warspite) with lowest caliber (thus lowest damage per shell) and
almost negligible reload improvement is just wrong.
PURGE THIS PIECE OF SHIT FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH! FOR SIGMAR!
Here’s the thing…from what I understand of the real ship WG as has
actually done a pretty good job of modelling it’s virtues and faults.
However, while the secondary turrets were kind of clunky, the main turrets
were actually considered two turrets each and were subdivided to minimize
the whole thing being knocked out. So yeah…more turret health would be a
good way of modelling this.
Interesting also that you bring up divisioning up with a “Cleveland.” I was
thinking that a division of this ship, a “Cleveland” and an “Aoba” would
cover all your options.
I thought sigma was smaller number=better stat…so higher number means
better sigma value then?
It’s bound to get some major buffs. I and many others have been hammering
WGing on Facebook telling people not to buy this. They are going to feel it
in the pocketsesss. They hate hobits and not having money.
Thanks for the info! Do you know when the Dunk will be on sale?
Jedi, you can do as many videos about wows, wot, hello kitty or whatever
you want. you are a genuinely entertaining, no matter what the subject is.
making this ship more competitive would be good…even though I never got
to actually test it most ppl who did have the same opinion as you.
I don’t really wanna go there but from real life POV higher muzzle velocity
meant higher dispersion and lower to better more accurate shots at cost of
shell travel time. Meaning the lowe muzzle velocity of Warspite vs Dunkeks
high makes sense that Dunkek has worse sigma.
Needs a “wave motion gun” I feel.
What I can’t understand is why the Schanhorst with its 2.0 sigma has so
much worse accuracy then the Dunkerque with a 1.7 sigma because with the
Scharnhorst I have a massive issue with shells either flying high or low
when firing at targets at short range.
16:40 Did you really just extinguish 0.1 seconds of fire there? …