STALINGRAD – AP Monster – first Impressions & Stats WIP || World of Warships

10,549 views
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (192 votes, average: 4.56 out of 5)
Loading...

🚩 Play for : https://wgpartner.com/?a=1290&c=2194&s1=

🚩 Forums : http://pzk-forum.de/ 🏆

🚩 want some FREE Doubloons ? http://m.onelink.me/9553016f Download the app and get your free Doubloons for World of Warships!
🚩 use my invite code: pzqqa for your first FREE Doubloons.

🚩Amazon Affiliate-Links:

Related Ship Rage!

44 Comments:

  1. and yes its AP only at the moment ^^

    • Just_Some_Random_Tryhard_Gamer

      Affeks agreed – down with the citadel-proof meta (so that we can actually deal with the unrealistic bow-on meta – that was the original priority).

    • well, because also the 457mm of Conqueror have the USN 8″ autobounce, I think they count too, yes they have the short fuse, but the have quite a lot of punch

    • Kuhluh 457mms improved autobounce angles were removed. It was there during testing but was for some reason removed. So theres really no reason to run 457s ever. Not even when shooting AP only.

    • Just_Some_Random_Tryhard_Gamer

      Affeks I wish they gave the 457mm the standard fuse time of 0.032sec – so that we can see the pinnacle of British high arc / plunging fire ballistics – like those of Warspite (considering 457s are inferior HE guns).

  2. Russian Bias 😀

  3. I wish the Stalingrad was completed in real life. She’s a beautiful ship.

    • Leonid Brezhnev

      And also due to poor Japanese tactics

    • Leonid Brezhnev

      Shut up lefty

    • mulletbaby01 You are very childish.

    • The US outproducing Japan is only half the story. They also had very good ship designs and some crucial technological advancements such as the VT fuse and good radar fire control. The Fletcher, Cleveland, Baltimore and South Dakota class ships are some of the best in their own respective weight classes.

    • Beautiful, but unnecessary. The Soviet Navy wanted more carriers instead, but Stalin had a boner for big gun ships and he made them keep her – they cancelled her immediately after he kicked the bucket.

  4. “”””cruiser””””

  5. Here we can see how most People are in WoWs – absolutly no plan how to aim …

  6. Was waiting for this. Looks decent.

  7. Risheen Mukherjee

    Its a good thing only the rank 1 try-hards are going to get this ship. And in any case, I dont really understand the purpose of these reward ships. Sure, the people playing them will be really good (mostly), so how does it make sense giving them a ridiculously easy, stupid ship as a reward? Give them something that is a challenge. A different kind of ship, with ‘some’ drawbacks. OP ships are OP and uninteresting to play, to be honest.

    • Risheen Mukherjee

      Toprak özdemir I’m not saying that they should get a bad ship. How about introduce a new concept altogether? Like, a secondary build cruiser? 27mm bow, but turtleback with decent broadside armour, lots of forward firing secondaries? And a skill similar to def AA, but effective on secondaries alone? That’d be unique. Why give an OP ship to someone who is already better than 99% of the playerbase? I mean, do these super unciums even play the Flint or the Black that much? OP ships are boring, and so, the Conqueror is boring too. This game ought to be exciting, thats all I’m saying.

    • Personally I dont see this as an OP ship. It AP only, only two consumables, 15s reload, radar duration is really short, AA is ok, its armor is decent enough to take a beating to an extent, and unless you have your target broadside or mostly broadside its seems to get more over pens and bounces then pens. Also spread seems to be a bit of a bitch and turret rotation is slow as balls. Could have just been this particular video but I wasn’t really impressed.

    • Risheen Mukherjee I think they mentioned somewhere this may not be a reward ship only. We will see.

    • Risheen Mukherjee

      XtremeXC29 note that OP does not mean over-performing. The Conqueror is OP, but playing it does not guarantee a win. In fact, it has the lowest win rate among t10 BBs, I think? Musashi at t9 is OP too, to some extent – but that is debatable. In any case, it just does not seem fun to play AGAINST Stalingrad.

    • That’s fair. I personally just was not impressed with it

  8. Stronk Ship Comrade

  9. Alexandr Abramovsky

    Comrade Stalin is happy.

  10. ♡♡♡♡♡♡♡☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
    Panzerknacker
    Erst liken dann schauen weil du bist bester Mann #Ehrenmann #BesterWoWsLet’sPlayer
    #Bester&SchnellsterKontributor
    #EinDäumchenWärEinTräumchen
    #SupportIstKeinMord
    #《《Liken,Teilen,Kommentieren,Glocke Aktivieren ; -)》》 ♡♡♡♡♡♡♡☆☆☆☆☆☆☆
    < ------------------------------->
    ♡♡♡♡♡♡♡☆☆☆☆☆☆☆# FirstLike&Commentingthen watchbecause
    #Panzerknacker=ManOfHoner #BestWoWsLet’sPlayer
    #Best&FastestContributor
    #OneDreamsWhiteDreams #SupportIsNotAMurder
    And @ all listen #《《Like,Share,Comment,ActivateBell;-)》》Then Support is not a Murder
    ♡♡♡♡♡♡♡☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

    • Meine Fresse geh sterben, bitte.

    • @Noisi Boy, bitte mach das nie wieder. Das ist einfach zu viel und ich denke Panzerknacker wird gekonnt versuchen, solche Kommentare zu ignorieren. Hast es ja nett gemeint, doch es ist fehl am Platz.

  11. Wie wird man eigentlich supertester in wows?

  12. Why make Hood a Battleship if this is a cruiser?

  13. Russian Yamato.

  14. Let me guess, only to be given to the best of the best players and cheaters?

  15. Georgian Warrior

    Mega Moskva

  16. Citadel angled cruisers from 13km away? Yeah, no Russian bias or anything…

  17. AYYYYY

  18. Citadel roaming shell

  19. If _Alaska_ gets classed as a BB, we riot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *