Update 0.11.1—Pan-Asian Cruisers: Part 2 | World of Warships

27,191 views
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1,200 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Pan-Asian cruisers continue to be available in Early Access, the Dirigible Derby battle type is raring to go, the return of Personal Challenges, changes to the in-game battle economy, and much more!
Update 0.11.1 is bringing the following new features:

00:00 — Intro – Update 0.11.1
00:35 — The following new features await you in Update 0.11.1
02:10 — A temporary battle type named “Dirigible Derby”. Rules
03:15 — Personal Challenges
04:05 — Navigate to “Gibraltar Pillars”—a special tab in the Armory—to exchange Mediterranean Tokens
04:25 — Cruiser Dido
05:00 — Cruiser Canarias
05:40 — Firepower containers
06:40 — Super Aircraft Carriers Eagle and United States
07:45 — Sixteenth Season of Clan Battles—”Albatross”
08:15 — Ranked Battles Season 6
08:30 — Changes to the In-Game Economy
09:30 — Tech Tree: Grosser Kurfürst and Khabarovsk will be replaced in their branches by Preussen and Delny, respectively
10:15 — Other Features and Changes in Update 0.11.1

⚓⚓⚓

🔊 Let’s dive into the details of these and other changes!
EU: https://worldofwarships.eu/news/game-updates/update-0111-pan-asian-cruisers-part-2/
NA: https://worldofwarships.com/news/game-updates/update-0111-pan-asian-cruisers-part-2/
ASIA: https://worldofwarships.asia/news/game-updates/update-0111-pan-asian-cruisers-part-2/

📝 Leave us a comment right after subscribing to the channel
🔔 http://wo.ws/YouTube-subscription

⚓⚓⚓

#worldofwarships #warships #wows

42 Comments:

  1. World of Warships Official Channel

    Pan-Asian cruisers continue to be available in Early Access, the Dirigible Derby battle type is raring to go, the return of Personal Challenges, changes to the in-game battle economy, and much more!
    EU: https://worldofwarships.eu/news/game-updates/update-0111-pan-asian-cruisers-part-2/
    NA: https://worldofwarships.com/news/game-updates/update-0111-pan-asian-cruisers-part-2/
    ASIA: https://worldofwarships.asia/news/game-updates/update-0111-pan-asian-cruisers-part-2/

    📝 Leave us a comment right after subscribing to the channel
    🔔 http://wo.ws/YouTube-subscription

    • I downloaded world of warships. to play against ships. if I wanted to play against planes I would download Ace Combat or world of warplanes. every time I see CV in a battle I will report it and leave the match

    • NO CV IN CLAN BATTLES, ARE YOU CRAZY……WG GETING WORST EVERY UPDATE….

    • WORST UPDATE IN THE GAME
      There is no need to change the kurfurts for the preusen

    • Im realy love this game bcus it im here complaining about planes .. im play it alot time but im in game for ships not here for planes

    • Emilio José López Nieto

      Why did you put Mexican music when you showed up the Canarias? It’s a Spanish ship, not Mexican. By the way, I am from Spain.

  2. 2:08 nakhimov shall enjoy this :))))

  3. finally ill recive also credit for damaging planes i ended up games with over 70k on planes my max is around 150 vs fdr

  4. we need CIWS for T10 ships!

  5. Bruh, nerfing cv damage reward and buffing kill reward will not motivate cv players to be more active, it’ll only make every cv spend the entire match trying to snap kills on low HP opponents instead of spotting or influence the battlefield

    • Taking a ship out of action is more beneficial to the team then to farm damage, especially when said ship is limping behind an island and starts spamming shells at you unseen…

    • @SeedlingNL While I agree that taking a ship out of the battle influences it, sometimes there are bigger battles to take part in, like contesting CAPS, helping to hunt DD’s, or helping in knocking out a high tier ship that’s been slamming your teammates the entire match. Focusing on random cruisers here and there that are on the 10 line or in the back isn’t going to help much. For instance, yesterday, every carrier player focused the smaller ships that had nothing to do with the battle, or simply wouldn’t try and attack the DD’s. That match ended really quickly.

  6. SILVER FINGER THE SILVER STACKER

    Disappointed with the pan asian cruiser line, its all made or post war ships, there was lots of genuine asian pre 1945 ships that could of been modelled and used for this line, same with the fake french heavy cruiser line. EDIT , Dido and a Canaris get a thumbs up.

    • same,they’re just worse than the original ones, like Jinan is originally Austin and has the worst dpm

    • @Skyline I’d take Jinan over Austin aaaaany day mate. The far superior torpedo power and smoke just dumpster Austin.

    • @dzello Jinan is worse because of its turrets,not torps. Jinan has 13.5km dt torps and Austin has regular ones for 10.5km and has a ammo reload booster.Maybe Jinan is closer to dd and Austin has firepower instead of stronger torps.It’s “Free Austin”,ya know

    • @Skyline No, Jinan is definitely better even if it’s free (in fact, Austin is pretty bad considering its cost).

      Austin has to sail open water and is only effective when it has its main battery reload booster. When it doesn’t, the ship is extremely bad and even when it does, it has to show itself a lot.

      Jinan has an amazing smoke that lets it dish its damage without being oneshotted. It also doesn’t require main battery reload booster to do it AAAAND it has the far more devastating torps AAAAAND a torpedo reload booster.

      I would take Jinan over Austin any single day, though Sejong at tier 9 is even better. Austin really isn’t that good.

    • @dzello I’d personally take Jinan,but I meant Austin had better fire and eventually can spam the enemy like dd or cl ca.Jinan is better at stealth and can take bb and cvs easily with smoke.Maybe Jinan is better at heavy ones and the latter one being better at light units.
      Anyways I think every ship have its features but I just wanna express that they share the same thing and Jinan is worse from that part(turret) but not the torps.If its torps then I’ll have to go with Jinan since it can have a salvo of 16 torps each side if the consumable is used.

  7. We all love new CVs, especially when you got nuked over 20K of unrepairable dmg, as well as broke engine and destroy all your secondary and aa mount

    • As opposed to dds who can delete ships without even spotting them, or bbs that that deal 60k of unrepairable damage every 30 seconds?
      Yeah, your light cruiser getting hit by 20 AP rockets while sitting still behind an island will indeed result in 20k unrepairable damager every 5 minutes, but so too will a yamato shell through the face…

    • [^/] 343 Guilty Spark

      Cv planes are not just dmg they do much more, expendable, sustainable, keeps coming as long as the cv is not dead. CV ended ocean warfare, do you need to ask for more

    • My no-smoke Tashkent just can’t wait to be dev struck by jet aircraft who appear out of nowhere, without even time to turn away.

    • @SeedlingNL Everything you just mentioned can most of the time be avoided just by thinking ahead. (Btw as a BB main I would be more than happy if I could just land 60k every 30 sec. But this is just not the reality.) And a DD, yes it can delete ships with a single torp set, but they have to work hard to get even into the right position and than hope the BB would not evade or change randomly it’s course.
      On the other hand, a CV player can just pick any ship on the map and can attack it whenever he desires to. And he can repeat his attack over and over and over again until the poor ship he happened to pick is dead. And no one can absolutely do nothing to stop him. Yeah, one can dodge, but this just brings the ship completely out of battle and even into potentially dangerous situations. And before you mention AA won’t stop any CV.
      Atop of this, a CV player is also not required to think, he just flies away and his performance will only depend on his aircraft handling skills. No forward thinking and planning is involved in his game experience.
      A BB on the other hand has to plan its actions often times several minutes in advance. Same for DDs and CAs.

      So pls go and enjoy your CVs but pls don’t state that your ship is just as difficult to play as the other classes because it isn’t.

  8. [^/] 343 Guilty Spark

    Airships are cool inmagine if they drop buffs periodically with smaller planes so we have aa firing

  9. this airship mode should encourage more close quarters combat

  10. so, basically pre-dropping with CV squadrons is getting more expensive now.

  11. High Caliber Replays

    As a CV player I highly disagree with the new economy changes. I, like many other CV players “dump” our planes (attack to send planes back to the carrier) to not loose a lot of them. I think that the economy changes are going to *increase* the amount of Russian carrier players because that class of carriers has a tendency to get more ships destroyed *and* because those carriers don’t have to dump. If I were you, I would reverse the economical changes to CVs before a massive community backlash. Just saying.

    • Implying they give a damn about community backlash at this point. BB main here but I agree with you though. I’ve tried CVs and understand why CV players do certain things. I’m also skeptical of the reduction in credits earned for damage vs increase for kills. I guess they want to encourage CV players to hold back and wait to start picking off weakened enemies.

    • @airplanenut89 Yeah this is a brain dead move by them. This just encourages us to kill steal rather than work for the damage.

  12. How about you add panic back to aircraft squadrons? At least then def AA would be useful for something on the older ship lines. As for going with the hybrid reload cycle on planes I can get behind that, it is more like the old CV design where you had to wait for a squadron to be serviced before you could use it again, it would increase the down time between strikes.

  13. CHANDRA FRANSISCO GAMING

    I’m waiting for all new ships

  14. Cruisers that can’t torp dds, that’s a real treat :(((

  15. 😍 Dascha! If only WoWS was exciting as you are.

  16. I would like to have Congress with the back turret with 3 guns, please.

  17. Giving unexperienced players the opportunity to optain containers with T10 ships inside is just bad for the tier and therefore for the game. One player, who got lucky and got a T10 has “fun”, but 11 members of his team have to compensate this newby. You sacrifice the other players fun and joy only for selling even more chances to skip to T10.
    This. Is. Just. Terrible! PS: We still have no option to start a certain number of planes while playing CV. why? I dont wanna start always with a full squardron…. plllllssss.. give us the option to say with how many planes u wanna start for each type you got. Pls!

    • Totally agree with the T10 buy-in crap but regarding the CV’s, why not drop certain amount of strikes into water on the way to the target? I know it would not be sensible if in close combat threat but throughout the match? Or are you afraid of the changed economy for ammunitio used, cuz I personally never found T10 economy to be *too* much brutal.

    • @David Lednický yeah, but if you drop them earlier, now you have to pay these “ammonition use” – thats why i said what i said.. PS: T10 should be wayyyy more expensive, that bad players should loose credits instead of “massively” earning them in T10.. T10 is the garbage tier nowadays

  18. good to hear that, having reset German bb techline, and elited the FDG recently again i don’t need to buy the Kurfrust again…. to get her in port as a special ship.. that’ll save me quite a few million credits ( i don’t have ) ..

  19. このアップデートが一番楽しみです!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.