World of Warships Best Ship to Make Money! Russian Sniper Ship

322,611 views
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2,536 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Close Ad ×

World of Warships Russian Navy – Murmansk Sniper Cruiser
WOWS How to Make Money Easy!

Thanks for watching!
-Baron

32 Comments:

  1. Now that is funny
    After 2 days, I thought to myself, what’s co-op mean. Its a good idea for
    starting out with

  2. SIGMA ZETA GAMMA

    +Gaspacho. Bestilando I did that till i think the 6th badge.

  3. +kongman27 lol, yes, you can put fire on yamato since your range would
    allow you to hit yamato, and yamato can’t hit you since you are moving
    FASTER and are more manoeuvrable than Yamato.. GET IT!.. dumbass..

  4. +Sasa Anakijev you an idiot , setting fires on a yamato ….you would be
    dead

  5. +SKLR317 yup, very bad defending, looking at mini-map and situational
    awareness.. this ship rightfully is great,but Baron couldn’t really
    demonstrate this..not his fault not everybody great at cruiser play.. i
    love my Tenryu and Kuma for especially this reason (rapid fire,high
    concelement,maneuverability,speed).. and Murmansk is like blessing from
    heaven..even better.. i mean 18 km range.. i’d be setting fires to yamato’s
    all day long if i had murmansk..

  6. gavinrichard ladd

    +Leeroy Uliuli Hang on I’m adding a quick detail. I’ll edit this comment
    when I’m done and you can refresh the page.
    Edit: Pls refresh your page and look at my comment.

  7. +gavinrichard ladd lel. great one 🙂

  8. gavinrichard ladd

    +Leeroy Uliuli
    “We apologize here at Ripoff Game Inc., but World of Warships was changed
    to closed beta due to a bug where the map would be flooded by salt water
    and tears, which completely engulfed islands. Sorry.”

  9. +TheGerudan LOL I was screaming at him to protect his Damn Carriers!

  10. You are goddamn RIGHT

  11. gavinrichard ladd

    +TheGerudan Butthurt Scale: 8.3

  12. +Aleksander Hoffmann I highly doubt that shells and torpedoes will collide.

  13. BaconIsLoveBaconIzL1f3

    +Dreadnought Oh I thought the Germans didn’t have a Carrier, so adding
    another Axis (NONE FROM JAPAN) carrier from countries like Romania or Italy
    would make sense.

  14. +BaconIsLoveBaconIzL1f3 Why would the Germans get an Italian carrier? The
    Regia Marina is going to be in the game. They had enough ships and plans.

  15. +Leeroy Uliuli That being said, it would be very cool to see a standalone
    game featuring submarines from different eras (although probably not the
    one from the revolutionary war, that was quite the dud). We could get the
    Russian Typhoons, Alfas, German U-Boats, the Japanese I-400 series, the Los
    Angeles American class, and so much more. It has the potential to be a
    really tense and enthralling stealth hunting game, where they could factor
    in sonar pings and cavitation noises while players try to evade and gun
    each other down. I could see myself SINKING a lot of time into that game
    *badum-tsh*

  16. +GrayAndAnime OwO It’s that they can’t render below the surface, that’s
    easy, it’s just that they don’t want to and don’t know how to add
    submarines (They probably know how, but they don’t know how to make them
    fit into the way the game plays).

  17. +GrayAndAnime OwO and imagine how hard they would be to balance. They were
    slow and when under water they would be hidden too well.

  18. +Bojidar Stoykov 😀

  19. +Dem Peepers He’s having tea with Davy Jones….I gave him da torpedus

  20. +MrAlumni72 i didn’t say that, if u play a SNIPER yes you must avoid DD
    engagements so you have time to snipe, if you play as supporter of your
    team from DD intrusion than yes, PROTECT YOUR CVs.. Baron deliberately
    avoided putting shots on DDs approaching friendly CV.. watch the video
    AGAIN.. i never as a cruiser avoid engagement with DD if he is near me(less
    than 10 km) AND approaching high value friendly target (CV,BB).. yet Baron
    did exactly this.. and concentrated on firing on enemy further away that
    posed no danger to CV.. i’m not blaming Baron,everybody can play as they
    want, CV player didn’t move at all, so he wasn’t paying attention too,
    ..but i’m not going to write nonsense as you do and say Baron protected
    CV)) when its clear he avoided putting effort to do that..

  21. +Sasa Anakijev So what you’re saying is, Baron should have defended the
    carriers more closely and at the same time kept away from the ships (DDs)
    that were attacking the carriers? Quite a neat trick; I’m looking forward
    to seeing your video on how to do just that.

  22. +Sasa Anakijev Alrighty. I boguht that ship and I am practicing long-range
    fire as You said. It really is tricky as you say! Well, anyways, thanks for
    the tips. I’ll be sure to use them!

    Cheers! 🙂

  23. +Przemko one caution .. you must be good at sniping..i mean at properly
    leading a target, Baron unfortunately not best as you could see, .. i
    usually use Tenryu for practice sniping( it has over 11 or 12 km and is
    Tier 3) in that tier its like big range, and has concelement of 8.6 km..so
    you are basically ninja with a rifle.. very good, but if you can get
    Murmank than yes get it, i would if i could spare the money right now.. but
    snipping at 18 km that means EASY kills bro.. nobody can hit you as you can
    react faster to incoming shells being a nimble cruiser.. but as i said.. u
    need to avoid engagements with pesky DDs, .. and be behind BBs so they take
    the brunt of incoming shells while you fire up the enemy thus providing
    fire-add on to your BBs.. this is how a proper long range fire cruiser is
    played..

  24. Alrighty guys. Thanks for some help! I’ll go with Murmansk for now! 🙂

  25. Murmansk has 14.8 km range – so closer to 15km than 14km. And the Omaha has
    to give up it two MINUTE advantages, or at least one tiny advantage and an
    extra set of crappy torps.

    Omaha CAN have 2 more guns than the Murmansk – but they are rear side
    mounted guns, so effectively it is only 1 gun per side, or 1 gun that you
    could use at any given point.

    The Omaha also has up to 4×3 torpedo launchers, but they only go for 5.5km
    and do 3k less damage a price whilst moving at the same speed.

    But to get an AA rating of 20 in the Omaha you need the final hull upgrade,
    which takes away 1 gun per side (2) and 1 set of torpedoes per side,
    leaving it with 2×3 like the Murmansk.

    Only the Murmansk’s torpedoes go for 8km and do 14,400 damage a piece, and
    the Murmansk has a 21 AA rating versus 20 on the fully upgraded Omaha, a
    2.5 second faster rudder shift for an INSANE 5 second total, which happens
    to be identical to my Yubari – which is one of the most maneuverable
    cruisers in the game. Murmansk gets 14.8 km base range, the Omaha gets just
    12.7 km. And finally – Murmansk gets a SCOUT plane – which brings firing
    range to about 19-20km, where the Omaha gets a “Catapult fighter” – which
    does NOT increase its firing range at all – all it does is help spot ships
    for you and once in a while it will get lucky and kill some enemy aircraft,
    it lasts longer than the scout plane, but it REALLY is nowhere near as
    good, a catapult fighter could follow me the entire match and I would STILL
    pick the scout plane for 1:30 as many as 3 times!

    Long story short; The Murmansk is better in so many ways, that I bought one
    because I got along with the Omaha so well in CBT, and I gotta say, all
    those things add up to the Murmansk being A LOT BETTER! I never hit
    anything with torps in the Omaha, but with the Murmansk, even though it can
    only launch 3 per side at one time, I often get at least one hit from doing
    a wide spread launch at CVs/BBs within 8km!

    Oh, and Baron, Murmansk/Omaha AP WILL wreck other Cruisers with ease! Just
    learn where citadels are, and switch to AP when you have a relatively flat
    angle on an enemy target, and rack up some insane damage!

  26. The Erie

  27. +Noobeecon The wall of bad grammar and spelling text. My eyes are bleeding.
    Never post something ever again unless you understand english.

  28. +Jacob Rice
    If it does thats just more WG BS But i think you will find it doesn’t but
    what ever this game has worse problems then that even though that seems
    very over powered since it means everything with tiny cannons can use them
    while invisible and not reveal their possition which is once again more WG
    BS if true meaning BBs should have much larger health pools if there not
    even able to shoot at targets shooting at them

  29. +Noobeecon it used to only effect secondaries but it does in fact affect
    main guns.

  30. +Fulgrim yeyeyeyeye

  31. +Fulgrim baron first go F yourself XD jk

  32. +Fulgrim awwwwww yea boy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *