Loading...Hey guys, today we take a look back at the Tier X British Freemium Battlecruiser Incomparable. Enjoy!
Discord: https://discord.gg/P5aR2PzVXB
Music:
Ross Rowley:
https://music.apple.com/us/artist/ross-rowley/1524460114
https://www.rossrowley.com
Music by Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio
Outro Music: Stranger Think- C418
Have a replay?
Music: Stranger Think- C418
Ross Rowley: https://music.apple.com/us/artist/ross-rowley/1524460114
https://music.apple.com/us/album/radon/1553896834?
This ship is just Repluse after a good bulking session.
facts
Which is funny because the camouflage scheme is actually that of Repulse as of 1942
I raged so much in my repulse that I will probably pass this one… For real
One glad it has torpedo’s I wish war gaming would put torpedoes on the ships that actually had them that would be a help
11:35 I felt that camera shake in my soul. I hate when the dispersion just trolls you like that
Lmao that camera shake is why I came to the comment section lol
Hey slmb, broadly excellent vid, though I take issue with one bit in particular… Good AA had me on the floor lol.
If the measure of good AA is can shoot a plane down before the rest of the squad hits you, sure. But I’d say thats functionally irrelevant. It cant defend itself from a kaga, let alone anything T10, regardless of how flimsy the planes are. I’d be VERY hesitant to describe the AA as good when the ship is an hp pinata of the highest order for a CV, not to mention their ability to safely ruin your day via spotting at 10km/20km when firing.
SLM……. The RN Battlecruisers design was not flawed at Jutland. What caused the problem was poor handling of shell propellants which were stored outside magazines and turrets to increase rate of fire as the shooting accuracy was that poor quantity of shell fired was needed to alleviate poor accuracy issues.
Totally correct. Fisher’s orders.
the design was still flawed since the ships were not made for the battle line, yet were pressed into the battle line.
@undertakernumberone1 That would be a tactical flaw not a design flaw then.
@undertakernumberone1 The design was emphatically validated in its original purpose at the Battle of the Falklands Islands 8 December 1914. BCs were the right concept for sweeping global shipping lanes clear of enemy squadrons, away from line of battle main fleet actions.
@Turbogerbil again… not really. At Falklands they ran into weaker, outdated designs with a far larger fleet… had they run into a more modern design, such as the Derfflingers, in more equal fleet that might’ve ended up differently. And Dresden still escaped, causing a massive case of “overreaction” becuase the pride of the royal navy had a tiny scratch… and lead to the Royal Navy shooting at Dresden despite having been surrendered to a neutral nation.
I got Ragnar as my first Steel Ship and coul’t be happier. It’s THE BEST ship in the entire game for my playstyle.
Love/hate the game after all these years. It’s addictive. All in all, it’s an incredibly dumb game in almost every aspect, crafted by Russians for profiteering and used primarily by western democratic end-users. Hmmmm. See a pattern here???
It’s pretty much the go-to recommendation, but I’d still suggest going for whichever ship suits your playstyle best. Steel is a bitch to earn and you want that investment to be worth it.
i realy cant decide between this and the mecklenburg. both seem like totaly fun picks!
One players opinion: If you do ranked / clan battles and are looking for a useful BB, go Incomparable. If you do mostly randoms and wish the Marlborough had some armor on it, go Mecklenberg.
My dude’s YT career has gone great that hes got his own private jet :,) i can hear the engine take off. Im joking of course lol
SLM is more or less on the money here, Incomparable is hilarious. However, the armour is not as good as he makes out, pretty paper thin. Any BB will blap her severely unless heavily angled, torp protection is non existent and HE spam does horrible things to her. AA isn’t all that good really. And she gets spotted from the air at over 9km, CV spotting can really ruin your day. All that said though, I still love her.
It plays like a light cruiser with 20-inch guns. I love out-spotting other cruisers and blatting them out of nowhere. I go for reload over range, which probably isn’t as competitive but having long range makes the ship boring like everything else. Excessively-long range BBs are why high tier games are so campy. Reduce their range and fun gameplay can occur.
Might be dumb but we can all admit it isn’t a sub or cv. And honestly, that is a win in my book.
Probably gonna get the Shikishima for 3 reasons. Better base despersion than Yamato. Rediculous overmatch, and the loud Bass from its guns.
Does the Satsuma have Shiki gun sounds?
@John Doe yes
@John Doe yes and so does incomparable
15:11 pls name the ship which has simultaneously better armor and accuracy. She has BS dispersion with 2.0 singma
Just plain ridiculous. Sadly I ignore the chat for the most part. Sometimes it has relevant information. Now the chat is filled with armchair admirals. Listen I am running because I am being torped and targeted by two three ships as well. Armchair admirals will cry that you are running away.
It’s so weird having so many bbs with dd or better torps. Brisk would be good on it also
Debating this or mecklenburg. The accuracy and stealth is the main draw.
Even though the armor is crap it survives everything but giving broadside
Oh yah superships would eat this alive
@Bret Bengard usually i respond with some sarcasm just to show them their being ridiculous. The guy who wished I got cancer I told him he needed help.
@Bret Bengard I feel you. The person telling you what to do after getting ERASED showing nothing but broadside in the first two minutes.
@AARON HEMSCHMEYER Terrible on their part. Just ridiculous. IT IS A GAME!!!