World of Warships: Thunderer Barely Hanging On

3,200 views
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (201 votes, average: 4.90 out of 5)
Loading...

Close Ad ×

I try really hard to take that B cap. I struggled a lot in the Thunderer. The ship is fine, the match was just difficult.

World of Warships footage of the tier 10 Royal Navy Thunderer.

52 Comments:

  1. Yes!

  2. Where is the russian bias video?

  3. really? press “T” for stats…. oldie but goldie. wouldn’t thought it still works

  4. Thank you SO much for mentioning the Thunderer’s AP is not the British short-fuse stuff, but real goddamn AP.
    I’ve seen too many Thunderer videos that didn’t mention the superior AP.

    • What annoys me rather is that people kept saying that Conqueror AP is good. It’s good against lightly armored targets, but not BBs.

    • @Aerroon on the other side of the coin, Thunderer AP will overpen more cruisers at close range.
      Best duo I’ve seen in Randoms is Thunderer/Conqueror. Good range, excellent HE, and the ability to Dev Strike anything afloat.

    • @R Blinson That’s true, but I think it’s generally not as big of a problem. It’s only an issue vs ships like Smolensk.

    • Versus Smolensk, I like to use HE. Either Thunderer or Conqueror will HE citadel all day. Even if it doesn’t, a single volley will usually force damage control on such a fragile ship.

  5. Anyone know who’s voiceover Aerroon is using for the captain? Thank you ?

  6. Thanks Aerroon I have a Thunderer it is basically what the Conqueror should have been from the start. I always assumed that the RN BB would follow the same lines as the Warspite but we ended up with HE spammers which has was a big let down.

  7. Can’t wait to get her. Still I need 50k coal…

  8. In Soviet Russia. DD is torpedoed by BB!

  9. Top destroyers: Shimakaze << Tirpitz << Lexi

  10. the thing on this video is the weeb captain!

  11. Sir Raint, Knight of Silverwing

    12:33
    That Daring almost avenged the Gearing you killed from behind with Venezia.

  12. Superior AP… how exactly? Because you can overpen the 30mm sections instead of bouncing? Or because you will now overpen everything instead of penetrating your target? There’s nothing superior for standard fuse AP compared to the short fuse AP

    And before someone goes “but BB citadels…” – the ones that are citadellable – like Yamato or Conq himself – are no problem for Conq to cit. Those that aren’t – like Rep or GK – good luck with other BBs, Conq really doesn’t stand out in the “doesn’t happen anyway”

    • wilkatis Montana is nearly invulnerable to Conqueror AP as far as citadels are concerned. Conquerors AP fuses above the deck after penetrating the main belt. Underwater, short-fuse AP travels so much shorter, so short fuse AP cant really do that either.

    • Because you can now citadel battleships. That’s why it’s better in my opinion. You rarely overpen citadels on cruisers anyway. About the only time it happens is if you’re close range against a Smolensk or something like that.

  13. Only 500k credits for a tx 200k win ? Thats yikes

  14. As Russian player, I can say that players on EU server just love to rush one side of the map with all ships (while enemy do the same), which is rarely seen on RU server.

  15. 8:52 that angle of the citadel is absurd wtf, not even Yamato could have citadelled there

  16. Here’s your tag line: “I don’t mean to make you cry but you wandered into my crosshairs, so….”

  17. That commander voice makes my ears bleed!

    • But why? It sounds so swee…

      Okay, okay, I get what you mean, kind of. I guess I’m just used to it after watching anime for my entire life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *