World of Warships – Z-39 can work even in this season

19,787 views
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (905 votes, average: 4.92 out of 5)
Loading...

Close Ad ×

Z-39 is German tier 7 premium DD and it used to be my go-to choice in tier 7 ranked. However this season it lost a lot of its value because too much hydro and radar everywhere. It lacks DPM but has big alpha, its utilities are not as strong as they were when not everyone owned a radar ship in tier 7.

However this is NA ranked and I only had and Z-39, so when I would die in 1 I would take the other one out for a spin.

Enjoy and have fun watching 😉

Invite code for new players – [https://playtogether.worldofwarships.eu/invite/JKzn67k](https://playtogether.worldofwarships.eu/invite/JKzn67k)

Visit my merch shop – [https://streamlabs.com/flambass/#/merch](https://streamlabs.com/flambass/#/merch)

Join the team on Discord – [https://discord.gg/PKXjfqN](https://discord.gg/PKXjfqN)

32 Comments:

  1. Just make sure don’t leave Cap too soon 😉

  2. I’ve said it before but why not. I think it’d be a nice addition for the top scorer on the *winning* team to get 2 stars. I do understand that sometimes players (especially dds) work hard and others get top score because of you, so I doubt everyone would like it.

    • @ainumahtar Irs not an opinion, its simply you being completely false. There are TONS of problems with your system and you think the Elo system is hard to make which a noob programmer can do very quickly.

      Its obvious you are clueless.

      Its insane that you even think the Elo system would tilt people to oblivion and make them leave lmao.

    • @Frozenstein Thats also completely fucking awful. You are literally making a system that is not based on winrate. Youd end up with people at rank 1 that have a LOWER winrate than rank 2 lmao.

      Youre also encoursging even more in game toxic behaviors (like farming) than the current system.

      What youve described is the worst system of the ones listed in this comment thread up to now.

    • @dzello @
      dzello
      Worst system? Wow. Then how about instead of being toxic as fuck and telling everyone how stupid they are, YOU come up with YOUR ORIGINAL system? Hmm? Oh wait you can’t , otherwise you’d have done that already Mr. Smart Guy.

      Not like the current system basically allows anyone to rank out simply by being carried by others… Even below average players. No real work needed other than play an x amount of games and have the patience of Buddha. Good players on the other hand are constantly punished by trash teammates that they can’t rely on.

      Also why should we even consider WINRATE here? Winrate is just 1 stat out of multiple that determines players… you are making an ass out of your mouth here. Not to mention how artifical it is, considering how much your winrate relies on your team and dumb luck instead of your skills.

      At least, if carefully balanced, by setting increasingly more difficult goals to reach for every rank (that you have to reach multiple times), you could still filter out bad and good players without the headache of the current system. Sure in the long run more people would be able to rank out, but it’s not any different than now. They can still do the same, if they don’t rage quit from ranked…

    • @Frozenstein ” Worst system? Wow. Then how about instead of being toxic as fuck and telling everyone how stupid they are, YOU come up with YOUR ORIGINAL system? Hmm? Oh wait you can’t , otherwise you’d have done that already Mr. Smart Guy. ”
      ^
      This aspect is already covered, you’re just too dumb to read apparently.

      ” Not like the current system basically allows anyone to rank out simply by being carried by others… Even below average players. No real work needed other than play an x amount of games and have the patience of Buddha. Good players on the other hand are constantly punished by trash teammates that they can’t rely on.

      ^ You complain about this yet make a system that INCREASES it, that’s just dumb in itself.

      ” Also why should we even consider WINRATE here? Winrate is just 1 stat out of multiple that determines players… you are making an ass out of your mouth here. Not to mention how artifical it is, considering how much your winrate relies on your team and dumb luck instead of your skills.

      ^ Now, that’s a new step of dumb. Imagine making a system where you capacity to make wins isn’t what matters. Explains why you thought your system was even remotely good.

      ” At least, if carefully balanced, by setting increasingly more difficult goals to reach for every rank (that you have to reach multiple times), you could still filter out bad and good players without the headache of the current system. Sure in the long run more people would be able to rank out, but it’s not any different than now. They can still do the same, if they don’t rage quit from ranked…

      ^ That’s not even true, you’re filtering stat whores at best. Encouraging toxic behaviors like afk farming in the back. You’re literally increasing ragequits too.
      4 paragraphs is what you wrote. 4 HELLA FUCKING DUMB paragraphs.

    • I appreciate you don’t like reading and apparently think your opinion is full on carved in stone tablet fact, but actually reading what I said before making another post that has no bearing on what I said might make you look like less of a moron.

  3. The usual “battlestation in the dining room” vibe ^^

  4. Xcom!
    I wish you had a second channel for your streams (broken into 30min-1hr chunks). I’d love to watch Xcom I love that franchise.

    • He should play Satelite Reign! It’s the spiritual successor of Syndicate. Still remember when I played X-COM “Terror from the deep” and Syndicate on my Amiga…these were the days.

  5. Lol season one was the only season I finished, made me never try again

  6. From rank 2 dropped to rank 4. Tough times saving a star in SEA. I gave up hating tier 7 season.

    • That´s what I am talking about above. You cannot do much about many of your defeates and as long as you don´t end up 1st most of the times (like there are usually more players performing well in the battle), it is annoying to have falls like this

    • Also hated T7 season… Finished @ rank 3, did not have time for more matches…

    • @zwerxyz around 3-4 would I end too. Meaning no grandparents visiting and playing only warships. Would just ask too many hours I didn’t feel to sacrifice

    • @zwerxyz and problem is not “just more matches”, problem is revocability of everything achieved. You can have wonderfull carry-stream and achieve 10 victories in a row and get to 2*** and just after few win/loss matches you can get same stream off loses. Its random MM.

      So GL in r4 again, enjoy your frustration. Fun and engaging they said…

    • @Jan Mitiska Played around 100 matches in this season. Just did not have time to play…

  7. Gave ThumbsUp after one minute.
    I remember how back then we had solid lead, than lost ONE ship – and our BB wrote in chat “This is lost, fck dis” – and went afk.
    AAAAAAAARGHHHHHH

    Right after “save star” was introduced i got R1.

  8. I would like it much more if u get 2 stars as first in the winning team
    I’m a good player but i hate to play save all the time to save my star (because often you can only save a star if you play too save/hide behind your team and jolo at the end)

  9. Do you play any thing else besides DD’s , Jean Bart and Mass, gets old fast.

  10. That voice line… on the kawachi… 😂

  11. LOL “Mrs Citadel WOW you actually hit something!”

  12. Arktos der böse Schneemann

    Have you played Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnaughts?

  13. Who was it that said z39 wasn’t good in t7 ranked in the first place, again?
    CC’s…

  14. I noticed something this season, that’s changed with the stars that I havent seen pointed out. Unless im remembering wrong, we no longer get a free star when winning a rank.

    It’s making this season especially hard.

    As for star saving…. I wish the first 2 would save it.

    Xcom2 war of the chosen is the best retail version of that game. As far as mods, nexus site with their vortex installer/manager, is what I prefer.

  15. I’m actually waiting for the Remakes of the Command & Conquer General’s, and Command & Conquer General’s Zero Hour!! I LOVE those… .especially playing China, with all the money hackers you can make!! HAHAHAHA Of course, setting up the American Air Drop platforms for income takes up space, but well worth it when you get like 12 down in a nice little corner of your base! NONE of the parachutes will miss then! (it happened sometimes, parachutes would over or under shoot the platform, and you would have to send someone to get it)

  16. I’m fine with the way the star saving works, but what I’d like to see is some more adjustment to the way score is accumulated. I’d love to see DDs get more points than they do for spotting damage, and for contesting Caps.

  17. Been there, done that. I highly prefer the current system rather than going back to “no star”. Those were rough days.

  18. That’s exactly how I feel on the PS4 playing

  19. Best thing about this set of ranked was that it was an odd numbered tier and so no carriers.

  20. Love how just after adding swedish stuff the russian devs had to add a “Poltava”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *