Loading...
Join the Discord! https://discord.gg/aSgYmSQjcY
WoWs NA Invite: https://warships.us/Not_PQ
Carry, Pushing, How To Win, How To Carry, Pro, Unicum, Tutorial, Guide, World of Warships, Fun, Funny, Captain Skills, Changes, Build, CC, Community Contributor, OP, Devastating Strike, Iowa, Missouri, Tier 10, Wisconsin, American, BB, USA, Battleship, Premium, West Virginia 44, Dockyard, Battlepass, New, Update, Missions,
He is ever craving the battleship dream, but now at the cost of other things (literally went broadside against a Kremlin close-range)
When will PQ learn..
Poor bastard.
I thought he was trying to test if he could get citted there no?
@@HailAzathoth No. He was surprised. He was convinced because he couldn’t cit it, other people couldn’t.
215K, Kraken, God, I’d be pissed off too! Horrible, horrible match. Time to uninstall! 🙄
@@oirvinetbf American fast battleships aren’t exactly known to be citadel…
She actually looks…balanced. And solid. Which is nice. I don’t remember a dockyard ship ever being OP, but some of them have been quite mediocre, like Hizen and Daisen. In particular, she really seems to be quite zippy.
i do remember a dockyard ship being OP, puerto rico?
The base ship is fine but that combat instruction seems a bit too much imo.
@@luukvst1032 not op just one of the worst dockyards ever and so its been talked about a fair bit more
@@luukvst1032I’d take my Alaska over my Puerto Rico any day, only on T10 only events will i run PR, but even then, I find myself taking ships like Salem or Yoshino instead.
Like don’t get me wrong, PR is definitely a decent ship, but her concealment is like Moskva bad, so shes almost always spotted too soon for her consumables to get proper use, plus shes just a big juicy target for any BBs on your flank.
@@luukvst1032 Nope. PR have bad dispersion and despite being a tier 10, Akaska is much better.
“Get _mad!_ I DON’T WANT YOUR DAMN DISPERSION, WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO WITH _THIS?!”_
I think it was the third game you wasted your F key for only one Salvo waiting for a farther ship to turn instead of your immediate threat to your front. Overall, maybe a more mid playstyle would be better. Super AP will overpen broadside cruisers.
I noticed that. Why not use the fun button, hit Columbo under the front guns again, and delete him? Made no sense to waist the reload waiting for the Venezia to turn.
@@guyintenn man wants his neuron activation citadel hits
He’s tilted that’s why
Super heavy AP does not overpen broadside cruisers any more than normal AP. AP overpenning is only determined by how thin citadel armor is, how fast the shells are, and how short or long their fuse is
Pq, you should stop putting high expectations of getting citadels on every broadside ships. Even a Slava one of the most accurate ship in the game, still cannot get a consistent broadside shot every time she fire her guns and Slava can still have wonky dispersion despite her best sigma value. Wisconsin is a solid bb and she looks pretty balanced to me. If she get too consistent, tight dispersion everytime and get all those citadels you mentioned she will too OP for the game. At least she can citadel at close range on the Kremlin and Thunderer while a GK can still miss at that range or just bounce.
Which is very frustrating imo…it’s not supposed to be mega consistent…but BATTLECRUISER dispersion with 2.0 sigma should be able to punish broadsides more consistently..
The thing is that his evaluation of a ship and what it means to be consistent are entirely subjective. He himself can’t seem to make up his mind about this “consistent” concept he’s constantly bringing up.
BC dispersion and 2.0 sigma won’t delete everything that moves broadside to you by your wish bro. It would be too OP 🙂
It probably should be more consistent imo, especially when you consider this is the best dispersion stat possible in game outside of Bungo.
But he used the range module which also increased dispersion in the game we need to remember that too. Without it should be better@@guohongli5727
Yeah that’s it Repulse, Renown 44, Incomp, Champagne also have BC 2.0 and some games the dispersion fucks and other times its the usual bent barrel shit dispersion. I think what PQ really wants is a BB with Elbing dispersion
Let’s not forget that the range module also increases dispersion, without it shells can go tighter.@@guohongli5727
@@jezzae4962 Wisconsin has better dispersion than all those ships due to American dispersion mod.
Hey PQ! Unless there’s been a change I missed at 18:30 when you check the enemy Shima’s torp range, I think when checking enemy modules, it shows the maximum possible value across all modules options, which would mean its possible he had 12km torps still. It should show accurate values for teammates on that inspector though.
I was gonna say something but you already got it.
PQ when he cant dev strike every broadside to ever exist ever >:((((((
Its like the last 3 or 4 ship reviews for PQ follow the same pattern lately. He Reviews the ship initally has one solid to good game, Has one or more bad games. Says the ship isn’t as good as he thought it would be based on the stats and etc. proceeds to release a ” i was wrong about ( Insert Ship Name ) ” Video a couple of days after the initial review
I mean to make an accurate assessment you need a larger amount of games. He’s just a bit too hasty imo, he should take a longer time to have a better understanding of the ship.
well this is a first impression video, so of course he needs some time to understand how to play it before he can conclude it.
If he found it was good later on, then at least he did acknowledge that later on rather than not making one.
his expectations are unreal, if it isnt a devstrike on a broadside target he is mad
He also has unreal expectations coupled with an entirely subjective perspective on what it means to be a consistent BB.
Totoally agree with you, I think at this point he seems to be rushing videos out instead of taking his time. Overall good content, but I never truly take his opinion to heart.
Now all we need is New Jersey
NJ should be a Tier-X, Massa Secondary specs, American fast cooldown heal, engine boost, and model her off of her Vietnam Configuration. give her comparatively weak AA as she only had her 5in guns for AA at that time as a tradeoff.
25k on an angled kremlin with only 406mm and still complain about the dispersion. Lol
Full pen on the ice breaker. That damage is expected at that range.
Plays since beta, get surprised when he doesn’t dev strike every ship on the enemy team.
That’s the Streamer/CC Syndrome 😂😂😂
Honestly I don’t recall torpedo belts having an effect on shells way back in CBT. And a lot more citadels were raised far above what they are now. Heck, go back far enough and even DD’s had large citadels.
change title to “PQ slowly going mad”
I could physically feel the despair in his voice
The dispersion is actually amazing for a bb.
maybe it looks like that but the actual hits arent
@@jaysonnunley6602it’s mostly his aim tbh. Either too low or too high or shooting ships in the wrong places. Nebraska has practically no citadel yet he expected to get a few shooting at one. His shot in the Vlad right after was way too far forward to get many citadels.
Sigma and dispersion aren’t the same.
@@riseandshinejp and wisconsin gets both
21:25 aims too high then blames dispersion…
Anyone else notice the Maltaception at 11:23? Killed a Malta while sounding like Malta. _Look at the accuracy, man! Look at the accuracy! Brother…_
Can’t wait for the “I was wrong about the Wisconsin” video in 2 weeks
I was exactly thinking the same thing😅
The circle of life
Bungo 2: electric boogaloo
Temper temper, in this case I think it’s should be tempering the expectations for BB guns in this game.
on twitch today he was VERY unhappy with this ship….. lol
PQ that last game was 215k and a kraken, your expectations exceed the limits of this game. The dispersion is great and the consistency is there. You’re not gonna dev strike every broadside you see.
i took out the montania last week and in 3 games I had 8 dev strikes. Sure 52% win rate, but I just happened to see broadside cruisers all over the place. That is why everyone likes to play BBs, now I also love to play the Marblehead and temp fate.
“your expectations exceed the limits of this game”
Say it louder!
He’ll be getting 15k to 20k salvos and be like “not bad.”
Like, what is he expecting? One 60k Salvo after another? Either that or he is the most blasé person I’ve ever seen play this game 🤣🤣🤣
@@brett76544 In 3 games 8 dev strikes ???1st case you just fight payed actors so its easy and what you say its true.2nd case you lie….I think the 2nd case its true…
I love how the coments about the ship are much more reasonable than the video
Honestly the ship seems great. Why PQ is taking such a low hp t10 into such aggressive positions sacrificing its good conceal and speed is beyond me.