World Of Warships Gameplay of the Tier 8 American Carrier the USS Lexington, showcasing her amazing fighters at her tier.
Can’t get enough of World Of Warships?!
WOWS Playlist!
World Of Warships Lexington Class Carrier! Clearing The SKIES
84,327 views
(1,417 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...
+JafuetTheSame i believe everyone would hate to return for refuel…even
you. imagine watching all your squadrons fuel status and your planes
turning around in middle of your attack becouse of low fuel. i think there
is enough distraction
+Matt0Rapp i’m pretty sure it’s actually a navy field 2 trailer.
5:55 ….Yes, he does
the German navy doesn’t have carriers so how would they compete if they’ve
only got Cruiser, Battleships and destroyers, yes there was a plan to build
a carrier but that was it
I thought DDs excelled at sub hunting with the high speed/turn rate and
having depth charges. At least… they would wreck me when I played Silent
Hunter 4.
For gameplay reasons, I could see submarines being limited to periscope
depth, visible underwater within few a kilometers range, and trackable by
sonar (again within a few km). More importantly, they would give another
reason for good carrier captains to exist. Sub scouting was an integral
part of air duties.
+Joe Chanoine there could be counter play like sonar that would spot them
and dept charges or anti sub mortars and even torpedos
they would be incredibly op
They won’t add subs, they never will. Changed the dynamic of the game
completely. No counter play for subs and they would have to add an up down
mechanic all way too much and makes no sense. Not gonna happen. Besides u
boats targeted merchant supply ships primarily. Hardly much ship to ship
combat once we figured out how to find them.
+Unhorsedbog6 Nope, it’s just they are still tweaking the already existing
ships
+Travis Smith Also Uss Saratoga was expended in the atomic testing at
Bikini.
The Lexington NEVER carried F4U Corsairs since they werent fully developed
in time. Fail Wargaming.
And they scrapped the USS Enterprise as soon as the war was over.
+Jacob Burdette Same with the Big Mamie (Alabama’s sister, the
Massachusetts BB-59)
+Nathan Peterson Man. Would be nice if they did. The USS Alabama is amazing!
+Jacob Burdette No SoDaks in game sadly
+Paul Erickson I know, I just asked what needs to be enabled to show
multiple planes.
Automatically my ass, it gave me 30 fps with a drop to 5 every 10 seconds 😀
+kumisz it’s your graphics setting. I had to get a new video card before I
had the horsepower to show all the planes. The game automatically sets your
graphics for the optimum playability that your computer can handle.
This guy makes a point, the thing that promotes border humping are
basically because USN fighters completely outclass the IJN counterparts,
leaving the IJN carrier captains no choice but to hide their planes by
humping the border and removing the fighter threat. Preventing border
humping does no good but relocates carrier players to playing US carriers.
So does increase in reward for plane kills.
As an IJN carrier captain (atleast in CBT), I frown upon seeing a US
carrier in the team list and have no chance to stand up against it unless I
remove the carrier off the team.
I spot the major problems with fighter balance as the following point :
US fighters have, if not same, but only slightly lower damage output than
their Japanese counterparts and with numerically superior force.
That above marks the main reason in me that agrees carrier play is broken
in warships.
Games COULD be more fun and less frustrating for us.
First of all, rebalance the damage output of planes , a typical
mid-war/late-war IJN fighter project includes a massive amounts of 20mm and
30mm cannons , while Americans stick with their never ending .50 cal spam.
Make it that Japanese fighters have superior fighter power to Americans
ones , but would still get overpowered by numerical supermacy in a
dogfight, where none will come out without significant losses to their main
forces. Secondly, removal of the slowing effect of bombers being attacked
by fighters , by any logical sense, you would run for your life if a gun is
pointed at you , so does pilots, you don’t slow down to let the guy shoot
you now , will you? Instead, mark a 2-3 kn increase in speed , still
manageable for fighters to wreck the bombers, just not as easy.
That was my (rather biased) opinion on the matter on the broken carrier
gameplay, I would not like to see any flame around the comment that I
almost typed for an hour.
+David Lee Nope, Open
+stefan talpalaru I wonder what class will be so called pocket battle ships
like Graf Spee. I suppose they will put it in as cruisers even though they
had 8×280 cannons plus 8×150 plus lot of others calibers.
+Trakr24 _ H-class are the only high tier German candidates.
And inb4 A-150 huehuehue
^ But just watch as they add the H-class with her 50.8 cm cannon .-.
2muchfirepower4me
+The Shadow Gaming The cruel reality speaks, the Bismarck sisters were
hopelessly outclassed by their counterparts at the time , I doubt it can be
a tier 7 with only 8 38cm guns and a fair amount of AA ability (although
they can introduce the Tirpitz modification that included deck torpedo
tubes), unless they give substantial buffs to its soft stats , I doubt it
would work anywhere beyond tier 7.
WoW waiting for the fucking BISMARCK AND THE TRIPITZ BABY!
+Rasta Koots yes… In about 2 years maybe?… And yes I hope the carriers
will have AI planes coz you think about it on some maps there is AI plames
that arent counted as players
wait what war thunder is going to have ships?
I feel like carriers for WT ships will be AI controlled, since with the
whole combined arms thing the planes will all be player controlled, and
simply driving a ship around waiting for people to land on you or take off
sounds even more boring than bombing. Who knows though, they might give
player carriers their own AI to command, while being easier to kill and
less effective than player controlled aircraft just to make it so that the
AI dont replace the role of taking a plane into a ship battle.
+Br1ckbuster yea hahaha
+LK Really? Gaijin will just make it so you go 5 metres forward and your
Ship explodes if it isn’t Soviet. I am totally not sounding like an idiot
right now xD
I’m looking moreso at the in-game part of this than the historical part
like wargaming tend to do
+dubhead spartan Yeah I rather have the realism of the planes being able to
go over a 20 kilometer map
+dubhead spartan problem is that it’s really easy to argue realism against
it since most naval planes had hours of fuel capacity.
+Jack Clark Respect my opinion. And stop sending messages through not know
what the fuck .
+Braeden Wise carriers are not artillery
Thank you! At least you ACCEPT it is in the game!
oh cool thanks
+Bradders He edited it, he took the Navyfield 2 trailer and cut it down,
and used a remixed version of Hans Zimmer’s -‘Time’ that was used in
inception.
+scousersuk Well i Agree.
+scousersuk tbh its more of a fuck you to all the western players, since
they’re adding the Russian navy before the RN or Kriegsmarine to appeal to
their local Russian comrades.
+Br1ckbuster You know as much as I might get some hate it’s just a complete
fuck you to the customers adding the pitiful russian navy before some major
fleets
+Anno2000 I’m slightly annoyed that the RN and Kriegsmarine is coming after
the Small Russian Navy.
+Mark R Subs won’t be in this game sadly, the devs said that it was not
possible to make it enjoyable with subs for both submarines players and for
ships players
One of the features of Lexington that always amazed me was her
battlecruiser derived armament of 4 twin 203mm turrets. Unfortunately it
proved not as inegenious as it sounded.
+CrazyChemistPL Indeed, Lady Lex was the most successful carrier converted
from battlecruiser (though i would like to see Lexington as battlecruiser),
her design were capable carry 70-80 aircrafts and have speed of 33.25 kn,
considering that Lexington-class carriers are the fastest and largest
carrier in early ww2 (before Shoukaku, Essex, Midway and Shinano).
WE WILL STAND UP TO GET OUR RIGHTS!!!!
Yuudachi-poi
+Cyaliq agree as well
+Cyaliq agree
+OhSome1HasThisName DD killer extravaganza
+NoPancakeMix232 make your dream…come true! just… DO IT!
JUST DO IT
Every time i ask for advise on youtube people say CRAP DONT PLAY and when i
play im god
+C. Jukes Bogue is just crap when you first get it. But once you get some
upgrades it becomes alot more bearable
+Dbars19 I was in CBT and clearly remember my fighters returning to the
ship automatically clearly for re-fueling. I did not command them to do so
and their weapons were half full.
Another thing I remember was torpedo bombers flying away from map and I was
not able to call them back nor start the squadron again even though I had
spare planes.
+PhlyDaily maybe instead of fuel they just have a time limit for flight?
+PhlyDaily Have you ever played Battlestations:Midway? if so do yo think
they should have the same spotting mechanics in WoWS?
+PhlyDaily the Akagi is in the but as it’s original class of ship, it’s the
Amagi Battleship
Play the Chester. Screw these high tiers, they’re too standoffish and the
games are so shittily balanced at high tiers. Everyone wants the big boys
but no one cares about Chester. 🙁