Seriously why is it so hard for them to put SAP secondaries on the Italian BBs? And buff Agir and Siegfried secondaries to make up for losing access to the secondary build commander skills on cruisers?
@RedXlV They are to lazy to balance the tiers that aren’t tier 10 to be good and have a personal grudge vs germans, hence why they’re always on the end of being nerfed into the ground but not their precious op russians.
@Alex I agreee with the ENDLESS grudge against the germans..I think its the DEEP seeded ww2 hate still. Cmon russkis..that was 70 years ago..Time to let t go…
I say hybrid ships like battle cruisers, super cruisers, and the larger dd’s, same with the smallest cruisers… should get to pick skill from both relative categories.
@Verands sdnarev if you read QA their criteria for buff/nerf is popularity. If ships are shits but people still play them they dont care (i love German lines and play them frequently although the powercreep)
@Legendendear ok that’s an overstatement Agir is tanky, but not stupidly tanky. Excessive plating shatter all HE and bounce all AP, but if caught flat, it just eats pens, let alone cits And its nose is big, and only 27mm, so 16 inch guns (most T9-10 Bbs) punch clean through it. Alaska and Agir play mostly the same so idk why you have problem with Alaska, ig floaty arcs is the reason?
Why do all the reviews say she has “long range secondaries” when she has the base tier 10 7.3km, not the 8.3km Germany and France gets?! (Yes I know that would put them at further range than her minimum concealment. They could have put them at 8km stock, and that still doesn’t explain the reviews calling them long range? they’re literally less than average range)
Loading...
finally, waiting it for 2 months
Wg be like:kill Agir and Siegfried secondaries, ruin any chances of italian bbs having fun secondaries and combine both into tier X to sell
Seriously why is it so hard for them to put SAP secondaries on the Italian BBs? And buff Agir and Siegfried secondaries to make up for losing access to the secondary build commander skills on cruisers?
@RedXlV They are to lazy to balance the tiers that aren’t tier 10 to be good and have a personal grudge vs germans, hence why they’re always on the end of being nerfed into the ground but not their precious op russians.
@Alex I agreee with the ENDLESS grudge against the germans..I think its the DEEP seeded ww2 hate still. Cmon russkis..that was 70 years ago..Time to let t go…
I say hybrid ships like battle cruisers, super cruisers, and the larger dd’s, same with the smallest cruisers… should get to pick skill from both relative categories.
@Verands sdnarev if you read QA their criteria for buff/nerf is popularity. If ships are shits but people still play them they dont care (i love German lines and play them frequently although the powercreep)
That’s some decent secondaries, hit 1/3 of all shells fired and decent damage.
Might be something to pick up and have fun with, secondaries are fun!
Napoli: Comes to game
Secondary build players: Who called?
wish they never made captain “rework” and we could spec secondary skills on cruisers
I am here!!! A bit late, but I’m here!!
Gimme back my siggie secondaries! DX or at least some better armor so im not getting citted through my damn giant nose so often >_<
10.3 KM concealment?
Wow that’s even better than the new british tier 10 BB!
It’s a cruiser, not a BB.
Thats the joke
Good lord, I was saving coal for supa fast HE spammer or CV.
This might save me from devil’s hand 😀
If this is what the final product will look like, we should riot so they rework the trash can that Agir is.
@Legendendear ok that’s an overstatement
Agir is tanky, but not stupidly tanky. Excessive plating shatter all HE and bounce all AP, but if caught flat, it just eats pens, let alone cits
And its nose is big, and only 27mm, so 16 inch guns (most T9-10 Bbs) punch clean through it.
Alaska and Agir play mostly the same so idk why you have problem with Alaska, ig floaty arcs is the reason?
@Legendendear How is Agir tankier than this? She doesn’t even have an icebreaker…
@Legendendear ok keep doing it then 🙂
I rather wish the Italian cruisers had more utility in their consumables. After coming off the US and French lines I feel like I’m lacking tools.
Hi Ichase, I don’t think you remember me but we were on the same team when you were testing Napoli (I was the Austin) thanks for the great game!
Cheers! 😀 that was a fun game, you had a very good kill early on, allowed us to do some stomping
These damn wehraboos abusing their op op german ships
why does napoli have a thicker turtleback than the entire italian bb line?
oh wait, it’s wargaming
balans
This is the correct question/answer… If you can’t make money on it, why bother..
@Matej Zilincar fact
@Face_Acounz *sad Prinz Eugen noises*
Grind one of the Italian lines
SAP secondaries: the ultimate anti-camping weapon
(actually no, but still a nice one)
Why do all the reviews say she has “long range secondaries” when she has the base tier 10 7.3km, not the 8.3km Germany and France gets?!
(Yes I know that would put them at further range than her minimum concealment. They could have put them at 8km stock, and that still doesn’t explain the reviews calling them long range? they’re literally less than average range)
16:42 less than 8.9km smoke firing penalty? on 254mm guns??? I mean wtf???
Gimmick on new ships to make them ‘balanced’
Off topic but, I dig the Rothbard pic.
peepoHappy
Oh, look: what the italian BBs should have been
Me, looking at German battleships: “Why you’re not like this??”
German battleship on wows designes by stalin himself…..
They might be with the secondary rework coming. But time will tell.
@Jevin Liu I tried. I find the cruisers tedious and the BB’s boring. Maybe I’ll go back to them later.
?dn2m?……n dm………………….nm…….mnna
……..mddm
………..m…msm
@Jevin Liu low tier is pure pain, up to t7 at least